Menu Contact
Robert D. DiDio & AssociatesRobert D. DiDio
& Associates
Call To Schedule An Appointment
917-300-0984
En Español
SERVING NEW YORK WITH INTEGRITY & COMMITMENT

Real examples of junk science and wrongful conviction: Part II

In our last post, we began a discussion about forensic tests which have recently been debunked as "junk science." These tests have been commonly used to secure convictions in cases alleging serious crimes like rape and murder.

In the courtroom, so-called experts would tout the accuracy and reliability of these tests, which is why test results were often very compelling evidence to juries. But in 2016, the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology issued a report stating that several commonly used tests were not reliable or accurate enough to be considered scientifically valid.

Bite-mark analysis

Each bite wound is somewhat different, depending on the human or animal doing the biting. Placement of teeth and other characteristics could theoretically create a unique signature that could trace the wound back to the mouth that inflicted it. That was claim behind bite-mark analysis.

Unfortunately, what works in theory does not work in practice. First of all, there is no strong evidence showing that one person's bite marks would leave consistent wounds or patterns. But there is another problem as well: skin is very malleable, and a bite-mark wound changes quickly as the skin stretches or tries to heal itself.

In 1991, a Pennsylvania man named John was convicted of torturing and raping a 55-year-old woman. The woman lived in the apartment building where John had been a maintenance worker.

John had a strong alibi for the night of the crime, and the victim never saw her attacker. Yet John was convicted based largely on bite-mark analysis conducted five months after the crime was committed. In 2009, the Innocence Project was able to exonerate him based on DNA evidence.

In 2016, the American Board of Forensic Odontologists revised their guidelines in such a way that members certified in bite-mark analysis can no longer testify that a given set of bite marks matches a given suspect. The strongest assertion that they can make is that a particular suspect could not be excluded as the potential source of a set of bite marks.

Scientific tests are an important tool for both prosecutors and defense attorneys - but they must actually be scientific in order to be valuable. When junk science is treated as reliable in the courtroom, it quickly leads to a miscarriage of justice.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

What Our Clients Say

  1. Pedro from Nassau County

    “I was arrested and charged with being the getaway driver during a knife point robbery. The police stopped my car a block away from the robbery with my co-defendant in the car with me. The victim identified my co-defendant to the police within 5 minutes of the robbery...

    - GREAT JOB MR. DiDIO!”
  2. We understand the pain, stress, inconvenience and financial turmoil that can result when you are suffering from a personal injury.

  3. Intellectual property law is complex — if you have an idea you should consult with an experienced attorney before making any decisions.

  4. Póngase en contacto con nosotros para programar una consulta inicial de media hora gratuita con un abogado con experiencia. Hablamos español.

  5. Póngase en contacto con nosotros para programar una consulta inicial de media hora gratuita con un abogado con experiencia. Hablamos español.

  6. Póngase en contacto con nosotros para programar una consulta inicial de media hora gratuita con un abogado con experiencia. Hablamos español.

  7. Póngase en contacto con nosotros para programar una consulta inicial de media hora gratuita con un abogado con experiencia. Hablamos español.

Email Us For A Response

Tell Us About Your Case

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Robert D. DiDio
& Associates

8002 Kew Gardens Road
Suite 307
Kew Gardens, NY 11415

Phone: 917-300-0984
Fax: 718-793-0165
Kew Gardens Law Office Map