Menu Contact
Robert D. DiDio & AssociatesRobert D. DiDio
& Associates
Call To Schedule An Appointment
917-300-0984
En Español
SERVING NEW YORK WITH INTEGRITY & COMMITMENT

Real examples of junk science and wrongful conviction: Part I

In early December, we wrote that a number of common forensic tests used by law enforcement are being called "junk science" by the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. The group issued a report noting that several tests used to convict people of crimes have not proven to be reliable enough to be considered scientifically valid.

Two of the tests identified as junk science are bite-mark analysis and microscopic hair comparison. In this post and our next post, we'll look at two real-life examples of how these tests have led to convictions that have since been overturned or called into question.

Hair Comparisons

First, let's discuss what microscopic hair comparison is and is not. Individual hairs (such as those found at a crime scene) contain DNA that can be analyzed and potentially matched to a suspect. Such tests have proven to be reliable if done correctly. But that is DNA testing. Hair comparison, on the other hand, is little more than looking very closely at two samples of hairs and trying to determine visually if they look similar enough to be called a match.

In 1991, a North Carolina man named Timothy was convicted of the burglary and assault of an elderly woman. His conviction was based on flimsy evidence: testimony from three paid police informants and an analyst who claimed that Timothy's hair matched a sample from the crime scene. Other evidence that seemed to implicate someone else was ignored.

Timothy spent 25 years of a life sentence in prison before he was finally released in late 2015. His conviction was vacated and he is now a free man. The Innocence Project has been pushing prosecutors around the country to reexamine cases where convictions were based on microscopic hair comparisons, which has proven to be unscientific and highly unreliable.

Check back as we continue this discussion in our next post.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

What Our Clients Say

  1. Pedro from Nassau County

    “I was arrested and charged with being the getaway driver during a knife point robbery. The police stopped my car a block away from the robbery with my co-defendant in the car with me. The victim identified my co-defendant to the police within 5 minutes of the robbery...

    - GREAT JOB MR. DiDIO!”
  2. We understand the pain, stress, inconvenience and financial turmoil that can result when you are suffering from a personal injury.

  3. Intellectual property law is complex — if you have an idea you should consult with an experienced attorney before making any decisions.

  4. Póngase en contacto con nosotros para programar una consulta inicial de media hora gratuita con un abogado con experiencia. Hablamos español.

  5. Póngase en contacto con nosotros para programar una consulta inicial de media hora gratuita con un abogado con experiencia. Hablamos español.

  6. Póngase en contacto con nosotros para programar una consulta inicial de media hora gratuita con un abogado con experiencia. Hablamos español.

  7. Póngase en contacto con nosotros para programar una consulta inicial de media hora gratuita con un abogado con experiencia. Hablamos español.

Email Us For A Response

Tell Us About Your Case

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Robert D. DiDio
& Associates

8002 Kew Gardens Road
Suite 307
Kew Gardens, NY 11415

Phone: 917-300-0984
Fax: 718-793-0165
Kew Gardens Law Office Map